IF YOU HAVE FACEBOOK OR ANY BLOG, etc

PLEASE! post this around.
(for facebook only) http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=1014996&id=704700265
the link above are proofs of how the western media has lied about the tibet incident!

my friends and i have posted the link/replied many msgs in a number of groups, but many kept deleting them and banning us!! please, please, please! they can ban a few of us, but they can't ban everyone!
even if you are not supporting a side, or hv already choosen a side, then at least post them around to give everyone else in this world a FAIR chance to choose their sides.

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2204672500
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=6420946883
the groups above are the ones that usually bans us, so please, post pics/link, reply msgs, anything! we can't let them get away with this.  TIP: open a document and save everything you write, so when the same topic comes up, you don't have to write it again, or if you msg was deleted, you don't hv to type again.

MORE LINKS, they can be posted as an item on facebook, or link at basically everywhere:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9QNKB34cJo  Tibet WAS,IS,and ALWAYS WILL BE a part of China
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSQnK5FcKas  Riot in Tibet: True face of western media


lastly, THANK YOU

my facebook user: Qinyuan Zhou

[ 本帖最后由 cat_zhou 于 2008-3-22 01:27 编辑 ]

本人中文不好，如果有谁可以翻译的话，多谢！

quotes

here are a lot of heated debate to date, however, for the sake of correctness, I would just like to point out that:

(1) No country has ever recognised Tibet as an independent country.

(2) Whichever side you are on, history clearly demonstrates that the land now known as Tibet was conquered by the Qing Dynasty in the 1700's, and before that, it was nothing more than a collection of villages as opposed to a cohesive central government.

(3) The Land was subsequently held by the Machurians until the British invaded in 1909, and it was later liberated by the ROC, which was defeated by the PRC, which is modern day China.

(4) The position of the Dalai Lama was CREATED by the Qing dynasty as the local governor of the region; and the current Dalai Lama has NEVER advocated independence for Tibet, only greater autonomy. He has also CRITICISED the current protests and violence by the ethnic Tibetans and the monks.
That position holds more sense than independence.


It is implausible to insist that every single religious denomination in the world is somehow entitled to have their own country. It is insufficient merely to insist on different ethnicity as the reason for a separate country. If that were the case, every country currently in existence would need to be divided into separate enclaves for blacks and whites; Christians, Muslims, Protestants and Catholics, certainly not an enviable goal for society.

There seems to be little attention on the fact that the official line of the so called ‘government in exile’ is that they also want territory currently located in India and Nepal as part of this new country they want to create.

There is also insufficient recognition of the rights of other parties involved. Buddhist monks make up a small percentage of the population. There are also a number of other tribes in the region including the Hui and Monpa who are in support of Chinese rule.

people need to know that the Western Media is biased!